May 21, 2005

  • Like most eager homeschoolers taking the first steps into an
    undiscovered country, conviction is usually greater than confidence. That could
    just as well describe our own state of mind when we took the plunge ourselves
    all those years ago.  It’s not unusual to feel these unequal tugs of anxiety and
    enthusiasm (even now, I may add). And depending on which side of the bed your
    child got up, homeschool is either the best decision you’ve ever made, or the
    most reckless! More so when your children are preschoolers.

    Then there’s the simmering conflict: how much of study and
    play should one incorporate into a child’s routine? One of our boys
    used to
    say, “a child’s work is play,” which is exactly what Maria Montessori
    would
    say, but then, what did she know about  I.T  and the
    internet?  If it’s up to the hundreds of kindergarten proprietors
    in the
    country, the earlier a child begins school, the greater the advantage.
    Hurry,
    hurry, no time to lose. And don’t just stop there – put them on a
    course of
    Computers, Drama,  Creative Thinking Skills, and the latest in
    left-right brain power enhancement!   

    On the other hand, homeschooling’s elder statesman,
    Dr Raymond Moore, thinks that such accelerated learning is a sure
    recipe for fatigue and stress in children, even serious harm. Start formal
    education later, he says, preferably around 10 to 12 years. “…the young
    child needs the early years for a normal blossoming period before he is ready
    for any serious approach to the skills of reading, writing and arithmetic. “

    (Better Late Than Early

    As an amusing aside, researchers from the Children’s Hospital
    Philadelphia have concluded that intensive toilet training before a child is 27
    months does nothing to properly toilet train him or her. All it does is to
    lengthen the months of toilet training!
    All this and more on potty training here


    His words follow those of famous Piagetian Dr David Elkind,
    Professor of Child Study at Tufts University.
    His book  The Hurried Child  (3rd edition), is a hard-hitting and
    well-documented indictment against institutionalised early childhood education
    (including industry and media forces) that only projects the parent’s need
    instead of a child’s inclinations. “Young children have limited powers of
    adaptation, which are sometimes exceeded by the pressures of adult scheduling,”
    he warns.

    On the other side of the fence is Richard Fugate, the
    well-known writer and publisher of homeschool curricula. His book, Will Early
    Education Ruin Your Child
     
    is a scathing rebuttal of Moore’s
    ideas (and his theology). “There is no reason that many children, beginning
    phonics at four, five, or even six, shouldn’t complete high school requirements
    by 13 or 14 years of age without undue pressure or strain on parents or child.
    Homeschoolers should be at least one year above their public school
    counterparts…”
    He is however careful to clarify that he opposes any “super
    baby” type of teaching methods, and is merely challenging the position that
    early formal education is harmful to the child.

    So much for the debate. What’s a simple Mom or Dad to do
    about controversies like this?
    I would say, examine your motives first. Are you exerting
    adult pressure on Junior just to keep up with the Joneses? Are you egging him
    on to unconsciously compensate for what you lack or to validate your own person?

    Second, know your child and decide what’s appropriate to his
    age and what matches his pace. Some basic skills such as reading, writing and
    arithmetic are important, but not every child will grow up an Einstein or a Menuhin.


    Finally, seek balance and put God’s desire for your child
    (and for the family) first. As much as we parents love our children, our
    Heavenly Father loves them even more. And as important as it is to start right,
    it is finishing well that matters most of all. 

     

Comments (2)

  • That's good food for thought.

    I didn't enjoy my younger Primary years. I thought it was a lot of socially oriented pressure and I had a difficulty dealing with people. I was bullied around a lot, I cried easily, and my teacher obviously didn't like me, or her job. When you've been bullied at a young age of five to nine, you carry the scars with you until adulthood pretty badly, so even though you consciously try to forgive the perpetrators the reasons for the bullying become a haunting weak spot.

    I think I would have appreciated it if my parents had the means of educating me at home, where I enjoyed myself with intellectual pursuits such as reading, drawing and writing on my own. I don't suppose I would have been very imbalanced, since I had an all right relationship with other kids in my neighbourhood, and if I had joined the formal education system much, much later, say when I was about nine or ten years old, when kids are much more mature and have a more developed conscience (young children have little conscience), I would have been a happier child. I don't know if I would have been a better child, but I would have certainly been happier.

  • And may I add, some of us never grow out of socially oriented pressure.

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment

Recent Posts

Categories