Uncategorized

  • Ever wondered where's the last page of the internet?
    Follow this link.

  • "Many students, especially those who are
    poor, intuitively know what the schools do for them. They school them to
    confuse process and substance. Once these become blurred, a new logic is
    assumed: the more treatment there is, the better are the results; or, escalation
    leads to success. The pupil is thereby ‘schooled’ to confuse teaching with
    learning, grade advancement with education, a diploma with competence, and
    fluency with the ability to say something new. His imagination is ‘schooled’ to
    accept service in place of value. Medical treatment is mistaken for health
    care, social work for the improvement of community life, police protection for
    safety, military poise for national security, the rat race for productive work.
    Health, learning, dignity, independence, and creative endeavour are defined as
    little more than the performance of the institutions that claim to serve these
    ends, and their improvement is made to depend on allocating more resources to
    the management of hospitals, schools, and other agencies in question."
     
    Ivan Illich Deschooling Society

    What Illich was criticising was the way
    schools (and other similar public agencies) turn us into slavish
    consumers who must depend on professional producers (whether government
    bureaucrats or corporations) to tell us what's good or right for us.
    When homeschoolers take responsibility for their own education, they
    are resisting what he called "approved measures of social control." You
    could say homeschooling is a form of deschooling in practice, because
    we see education as a lifelong commitment to formal and incidental
    learning utilising new approaches that foster life values, not dead
    knowledge.
     
    I would take that to mean values that express love for God
    in heart, soul, mind, and strength - and love for our neighbour as we
    love ourselves.

  • I am looking back at early influences that
    might have moved me towards my current understanding of schooling and
    education. Back when I was a secondary student -  maybe 16 or 17, I had two
    pretty progressive teachers: Mr Lee taught English, while Miss Pillai taught
    literature.

    Miss Pillai was strident in her political
    views and occasionally ran into trouble with the authorities, but she made us
    understand that literature wasn’t just words and stories, but ideas that shaped
    society.

    Mr Lee who was more laidback, lent me books. Like Herbert Kohl’s 36
    Children
    , John Holt’s How Children Learn, and Ivan Illich’s Deschooling Society.
    Lee and Pillay were a couple who shared a modest apartment not far from the
    school they taught in. 

    Those paperbacks packed a wallop. I don’t think I understood
    fully what these
    authors were saying, much less grasped how radical these books were
    then in the
    mid-70s. I don’t think I understood how influential these men’s ideas
    were -not knowing any better - but I was utterly sold on their
    arguments. They were questioning conventional wisdom about
    schools, how kids learn, how process and substance were two different
    things, and yep, they certainly made me ask the same questions although
    I couldn’t
    see how anyone could beat the system.

    In some ways, you could say these early
    ideas made it easier for me to ‘deschool’ and homeschool my own kids when the
    time came. Since then there have been other books, but that's a story for another time.

    What early influences led you to homeschool?

  • 15 year-old Ethan wants to know what algebra has to do with his life and unwittingly reveals he won’t be the next Einstein. I was not crazy over math back in school so I understand his frustrations.


     


    A homeschooling blogger  who uses the Principle Approach in her home says, Math is what God uses to hold our orderly Universe together. In fact, math is what gives our Universe order. Math is the language of Creation,” and therefore should motivate its learning and teaching. It’s a mind-blowing thought for sure, but I understand that adding God to the equation won’t necessarily make calculas and algebra any simpler. Still it ought to change the way we think or feel about learning.


     


    There are many ways to look at education since it encompasses processes (how we learn) and formal knowledge (what we learn), but what is it all for? The late Neil Postman in his book End of Education said the purpose of education is to provide moral guidance, a sense of continuity, explanations of the past, clarity to the present, and hope for the future. It’s certainly well put but as it is all too clear, more education does not a better world make.


     


    To be fair Postman does give suggestions to actively connect thought and deed, knowledge and service, so that society gains from education. But to do that, he proposed we rescue schools from their deplorable state with a complete overhaul, which is as likely as a goose laying a golden egg.


     


    The 9th century Persian mathematician Al-Khwarizmi who introduced Medieval Europe to arithmatic and algebra (from the Arabic al-jabru) called the latter ”the science of restoration and balancing.” I’d like to think it’s a definition that clues us in on what’s the point in any education - if I may be allowed to extrapolate from his thought. Learning is more than acquiring knowledge or mastering a skill. To quote Dewey, it’s not preparation for life, because learning is life itself. And life expresses itself not just passively in our being, but also in our doing, which must include that which brings restoration and balance in a world tainted by the Fall.


     


    Jesus who came not to be served but to serve went about teaching and doing good, so the Gospels tell us. In his letter to the Ephesians Paul said that the Church of God has been amply gifted with teachers,pastors, and prophets to equip His people for works of service . And to Timothy, Paul said that the Bible was given to equip God’s people for good work.


     


    The impulse behind all learning is to know God and His work in creation and history. We glorify Him when our learning finds expression in service to others. It was the great reformer Martin Luther who once wrote that God does not need our good works, but other people do. Life-long learning for a life of service. Makes sense to me. Now can anyone help Ethan make sense of algebra?



  • Familial education freedom under threat down under

    It appears that state governments in Australia
    are eyeing homeschools with intentions to regulate the growing movement. Julie
    Novak writes of her apprehension over state interference in legitimate family
    freedom:

    Along with control over government and
    non-government schools, the reach of state regulations is gradually being
    extended into the home-school sector. In all states except  Victoria the
    respective education legislation states that it is the responsibility of the
    minister for education (and not parents) to provide for the education of
    children. Further, under state regulations, if parents wish to home educate
    during the compulsory schooling years they must seek the permission of their
    state government to do so, typically through a registration or dispensation
    process.

    This allows states to identify
    home-schools, and serves as a regulatory “back door” to impose a range of
    conditions on home-schooling environments. These potentially include
    conformity to state curricula, testing and evaluation standards and for
    individual home-schools to report regularly to education departments on their
    activities and student outcomes. It requires that the parent providing the
    home-schooling is a registered teacher, and allows officials to monitor a
    home-school as they see fit.

    In essence, the states are increasingly
    responding to the challenge provided by the home-school movement to its
    education monopoly by systematically undermining and co-opting parents by
    establishing “government home-schooling” programs. In attempting to regulate
    truly independent Australian home-schooling out of existence by making them
    operate more like conventional government schools, the states and territories
    are once again demonstrating their willingness to encroach on school choice
    options and, in the particular case of home-schooling, familial educational
    freedom and independence itself.

    You can read the whole article here.
    The road ahead for homeschoolers in the land of Oz is getting bumpy.
    But unlike Australia, we in Malaysia have little or no recourse whether for dialogue
    or judicial review of homeschool-unfriendly laws.

  • A British study has concluded that emails hurt IQ and productivity more than smoking marijuana .

    "We have found that infomania, if unchecked,
    will damage a worker's performance by reducing
    their mental sharpness."  Dr. Glenn Wilson.



    The survey of 1,100 Britons showed:

  • Almost two out three people check their electronic messages out of office hours and when on holiday
  • Half of all workers respond to an e-mail within 60 minutes of receiving one
  • One in five will break off from a business or social engagement to respond to a message.
  • Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during
    face-to-face meetings were rude, while three out of 10 believed it was
    not only acceptable, but a sign of diligence and efficiency.
  • Now what do you make of that? Technology is making us all stoopid...

  • A couple of years ago, former education director-general Tan Sri
    Murad Mohd Nor, commenting on a review on the national education system
    said the country needed "a national system, in which students in
    religious, private or national schools learnt the same things and
    shared the same philosophy."

    Recently, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi in voicing his
    rejection to license more Chinese medium schools (and other vernacular
    schools) said that "...such schools where students share a
    curriculum and facilities, that students of different races will learn
    to bond with each other. This experience will benefit them tremendously
    and strengthen the bonds and unity the Government has been trying so
    hard to improve."

    Obviously not much has changed as far as education policies go. But
    there is certainly one thing that standardised mandatory public
    education will do: it will make our kids compliant conformists and
    therefore, more easily manipulated. If it seems like a moot point
    today, ask Hitler what he thought way back in 1933 when he seized
    kindergartens and schools, rewrote textbooks to emphasise Germanism Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil) and made membership in Hitler Youth compulsory:

    "When an opponent says, I will not come over to your
    side. I calmly say, 'Your child belongs to us already'. What are you?
    You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp.
    In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community."

    How chillingly prescient theologian J. Gresham Machen was when in 1925 he wrote in Reforming the Government Schools that, uniformity in education should be avoided as one of the 'very greatest calamities into which any nation can fall.'

    I am not convinced when politicians tell us they have only the best
    intentions in mind. I appreciate that running a country is difficult
    business involving complex and sensitive political realities. That is
    why governments around the world are easily seduced by the ideology of sameness.

    But we should all be for more educational access, more diverse
    schooling choice, and not just improved (least of all, standardised)
    curriculum for all. Since that won't come any time soon, count me out
    of the system. I'm taking ownership of my children's education, and
    their future. Right now, my vote's on homeschool.

  • ABCs for the New Year

    We do not all enter the New Year in the same fashion. For a new
    homeschooler it will be a year of transition, a new way of doing
    things, a new routine even. For older homeschoolers, it's usually a new
    resolve to improve their performance. The more regimented among us
    would have a mission statement spelled out, all purpose-driven and
    milestone appointed. But whether by force of habit or compelled by
    circumstances, many others will be stumbling into the new calendar
    while they are busy doing other things.

    Ten years ago, we burnt our bridges and boldly went where few had trod (at least in Malaysia).
    We had decided to keep our two children at home (now 15 and 13), believing it was the
    best thing to do. You can imagine the mixed feelings we had, like the
    ones that overwhelm when you are leaving home for the first time. You
    quickly realise that all the stories you hear from friends and
    relatives or books you've read, never quite become the script you
    rehearse in anticipation of the life you've chosen.


    This is not to say that homeschool is not all it's made out to be.
    It's just that we are all different and we are shaped as much by the
    choices we make as by the circumstances we're placed in. Through the years, 
    we
    have evaluated the course we've taken, and I dare say it's like the
    ABCs: the alphabet is the same, but the letters are forming new words
    enriching our collective vocabulary.


    Here are a few useful words we've learnt:

    ACCEPTANCE
    Whether
    you're new to homeschool or not, the first thing you need to do is to
    accept one another. The heroes of the homeschooling community and the
    achievers we read about are great motivational stuff. It is right to be
    challenged and encouraged to achieve similar feats, but beware the
    tyranny of false expectations.

    The very reason why we homeschool is to
    break out from the rigidity of artificially imposed standards. So we
    ought not do the same and presume our children will learn in the same
    way, at the same pace, and in words unspoken, do us parents proud as if
    to prove homeschool right.

    For instance, not every child must or will read at 3 or 4 years, or
    become a music prodigy. In the early ages, all a child needs are active
    play and a supportive parent-child relationship. There is something to
    be said about what we think our child needs as opposed to what he or
    she is ready for. Learning readiness (as well as learning styles)
    differs from person to person. Of course, the right attitudes towards learning must be
    nurtured, but we need to be clear about whose milestones our child is
    measured against, and for whose pleasure we desire what we are pursuing.

    Bear in mind also that we parents have our limits too. Your spouse is not the
    fount of all knowledge, and neither are you. I cannot speak for all
    parents, but I know I am not Father of the Year material, and I should
    not expect my wife to be Super Mom of the Year. Share the load, engage
    tutors even if necessary.

    Although by homeschooling we reduce the number of variables, it does
    not mean we now have enough time to do everything in a home. Not many
    of us will have the luxury to do all things well, but by God's grace we
    can decide to pay attention to the few that matter.

    BALANCE
    Second, we should always aim at balance in our homeschool. By this I
    mean a healthy approach to building mind, body and soul. In the words
    of social theorist Neil Postman, true education must include, "the art
    and science
    of question-asking." This will come from wide reading and deep
    conversations. We must aim at becoming as familiar as Paul himself was
    (with Greek writings), and as the early Church Fathers (like Augustine)
    were with s
    ecular classics and philosophies of their day.

    Nevertheless, it would not do to develop external skills, head
    knowledge and competence without equally building our child's interior
    life. Granted, this cannot be artificially induced. But the seeds must
    be planted early so that God can breathe life into them in his time so
    the child resonates with the disciplines and passions of a person who
    knows Jesus personally.

    Balance also means giving a child an acceptable level of social
    interaction. Church friends and activities are good, but we also need
    to ask how else to expand our circle beyond the holy huddle. I remember
    what Luis Palau once said, that when manure is spread out, it fertilises. Pile them in one place and it does nothing but stink.
    Ministry and community service help us to look away from
    self-indulgence and protection of our comfort zones.

    CONVICTION
    Finally, hold on to your convictions. I have observed that the less
    clear a parent is regarding homeschool concepts, the more frazzled he
    or she is likely to be. Social pressures (from non-homeschooling
    parents, friends or church leaders) will shake your confidence if you
    do not know what you are doing. Differing ideas between Mom and Dad
    also puts a strain on how to homeschool or discipline a child. In that
    unhappy state, a child is not going to find an environment that is
    conducive to learning and spiritual formation.

    It's not uncommon to hear people say they homeschool because the
    present education system is 'bad.' That's a reason – up to a point
    –  but
    is this all? Because that would mean scraping home education if a new
    school opens next door promising everything you ever dreamed about to
    help your child achieve his 'full potential' (endorsed by 'experts' no
    less!). Go ahead and enroll your child if it works for you, but in
    the meantime it's going to have a bearing on your attitudes and the way
    you educate your child at home.

    A tentative "I-wish-I-didn't-have-to-homeschool-but-I've-got-no-choice"
    position will make homeschool unbearable for yourself and your child.
    If you should take your child out of conventional schooling, you must
    be clear what you are putting him into as a substitute, for how long,
    and to what end. The bewilderment over curriculum or methodology can  usually be traced to misunderstanding of means and ends, but mainly to unarticulated convictions.

    You need to be clear too that homeschool comes packaged with some
    'risks', the way conventional schooling has its own. Let me qualify
    that: we are all pioneers making things up as we go along, living with
    less than our ideals demand while we work to make things better for
    ourselves, and especially for the ones who will come after us.
    Homeschool IS viable  and
    practical, but it will ask a lot out of you and your spouse. Like
    parenting, what it asks is, what are you prepared to pay to make it
    work?

    Let me say that if we have to live our lives all over again, we would make the
    same decision to educate our boys at home. Homeschool has been a real blessing
    in more ways than one. We experienced the faithfulness of God to make us equal
    to the challenges that came. We learnt what it meant to obey God one day at a
    time, and then to leave the consequences to him. As you go along, I have no
    doubt you'll learn the same.


    [Originally posted on Homefrontier Online]

  • An online homeschool convention? Hmm, that's a new one. But it looks like it's going to fly....

    Don't miss the First Online Homeschool Convention
    Thursday, April 21, 2005
    Spunky HomeSchool Convention Center

    The Convention Opens at 9 AM (EST)

    Visit Spunky here.
    I asked to be linked and submitted a piece about the ABCs of
    Homeschooling. Don't forget to check out  Spunky's online
    convention!
    See ya!

  • Recently, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in voicing his rejection to license more Chinese-medium schools (and other vernacular schools) said that "… in such schools where students share a curriculum and facilities, that students of different races will learn to bond with each other," he said. "This experience will benefit them tremendously and strengthen the bonds and unity the Government has been trying so hard to improve."

    I wish the prognosis for national unity is that simple, but the above statement explains why homeschool isn't going to find favour with the MOE anytime soon.

    It is noteworthy that our PM's views are shared by many other officials who exert influence on education in the country. National Union of the Teaching Profession secretary-general Lok Yim Pheng was reported as saying that school is the best place to inculcate good values among children as they spend six hours there daily. SUHAKAM commissioner Datuk N Siva Subramaniam (also the previous Sec-Gen of NUTP) agrees that the school is perfect for "educating children on ethics, unity, patience and tolerance."

    In another development, Higher Education parliamentary-secretary Dr Adham Baba announced that Malaysian students wishing to study abroad would now require a 'non-objection certificate' before leaving the country. Needless to say, his proposal triggered loud rounds of protests. It appears the Government wants to have a say on who qualifies for studies abroad. "We will advise them from going abroad if their academic records are not so good and we won't issue the certificate," he said. 

    The politicization of education in the country ensures that the dictates of national agenda such as race, language, religion, and integration will supersede other considerations. Like real education. So if you are homeschooling, know that education in the country lies at the intersection of vested interests and officials who have enough power to change its shape and form at a mere keystroke.

    What this means is, nothing is ever certain. Questions we're often asked about legality of homeschooling and transition to college are at best qualified answers. Yes, there are ways to get around the hurdles if you want to homeschool; and sure, many homeschoolers have indeed found their way into private colleges, thank God.

    Yet parents who choose to educate their child at home truly walk by faith, that internal conviction (often acted out in reckless trust) without which the letter writer to the Hebrews says it is impossible to please God (Heb 11:6). We may never have enough knowledge to fill in the blanks or anticipate things to come, but we surely have enough understanding to press on, by God's grace. The truth is, it's about walking by faith and not by sight.

    In times like this I draw encouragement from Scripture that our God remains sovereign over all, both the seen and unseen. Even the hearts of kings rest in God's hand, as Proverbs 21:1 says, and He "directs it like a watercourse wherever He pleases."


    In the meantime, I'll be doing alot of watching and praying.

  • dbctan

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    Categories